A Growing ‘Wealth-Poverty Gap’: The Way Prosperity and Hardship Are Found Cheek by Jowl in Across England.
Within a postwar estate known as ‘The Nunny’, inhabitants occupy homes only a few metres from their wealthier neighbours in the adjacent Scartho village. One six-foot-tall wall literally separates the two areas in the town of Grimsby, sealing off roads and walkways that once connected them.
“It’s the posh-poor divide,” said Serenity Colley, 37. “It’s been like this for as long as I’ve known. I doubt they’ll take it down because I suspect they’ll want to mix with us.”
An Increasingly Common Pattern Across the Country
Data from official figures shows the extent of inequality often exists, at times over little more than a short distance of asphalt, a line of hedges or a barrier. Decades of budget cuts and lack of funding have led to a situation where a majority of local authorities now have a neighbourhood ranking as one of the most deprived in the country.
The spread of poverty has led to a significant rise in the number of places where deprived and affluent residents find themselves living side by side. Just a few years ago, just 65 of the most deprived areas adjoined one of the wealthiest. This number rose to 119 in the latest data.
A Barrier Which Divides More Than Space
In Grimsby, the gap is the most pronounced in the country and starkly apparent. The wall is much more than a symbolic divide; it causes very real difficulties for daily routines.
- School runs that ought to take 15-20 minutes become an sixty-minute detour.
- Reaching important services like grocery stores, schools and employment centres is hindered.
- The area can attract vandalism and loitering, with reports of rubbish being dumped over the wall and other problems.
“You try to maintain a well-kept home and garden, and then you live opposite that,” said one local, gesturing towards the corroded barricade.
Community Spirit Amidst Challenges
Within Centre4, staff emphasise that support transcends addresses. “Where you live is not a reliable indicator of your personal struggles,” explained director a community leader.
Regardless of ranking in the lowest 10% for multiple deprivation indicators, Nunsthorpe boasts a strong sense and sense of community among its residents. By contrast, the neighbouring area ranks among the least deprived 10% overall.
Echoes Elsewhere: Stanhope in Ashford
This pattern is repeated nationally. The Stanhope area in Ashford, Kent, a 1960s housing development, is in the most disadvantaged tenth of neighbourhoods in the country. It is immediately adjacent by large houses built in the 2000s that sit in the top 10% for employment and living environment.
“They may possess larger properties, but here there’s more community,” said a long-term resident, 63. “You’ll probably find many people over there don’t even speak to each other.”
The financial divide is clear: an typical family home costs about £275,000 on the estate, while on the other side equivalent homes fetch about £410,000.
Locals speak of a palpable feeling of neglect. “Our neighbourhood gets ignored,” stated resident Susan. “Over here our amenities have gradually disappeared, and the majority of the issues we face here are to do with poverty.”
The rise in these ‘deprivation divides’ paints a portrait of an ever more divided England, where wealth and deprivation are frequently uncomfortably in close proximity.