🔗 Share this article

Around the globe, governments are investing hundreds of billions into the concept of “sovereign AI” – building their own AI technologies. From the city-state of Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and the Swiss Confederation, states are racing to develop AI that comprehends native tongues and local customs.

The Global AI Battle

This initiative is part of a wider global competition dominated by tech giants from the US and the People's Republic of China. While organizations like OpenAI and a social media giant allocate substantial capital, developing countries are additionally taking their own investments in the AI landscape.

However amid such huge amounts involved, can developing nations achieve notable gains? According to a analyst from a prominent research institute, Except if you’re a wealthy nation or a large firm, it’s a substantial challenge to develop an LLM from nothing.”

Defence Considerations

Many countries are unwilling to depend on overseas AI models. Across India, as an example, Western-developed AI tools have at times been insufficient. One example saw an AI agent employed to teach pupils in a distant community – it communicated in English with a thick US accent that was nearly-incomprehensible for regional users.

Additionally there’s the national security dimension. In the Indian military authorities, using particular international systems is seen as unacceptable. According to a developer explained, It's possible it contains some arbitrary training dataset that may state that, oh, Ladakh is outside of India … Using that particular AI in a security environment is a major risk.”

He added, “I have spoken to individuals who are in defence. They aim to use AI, but, disregarding specific systems, they don’t even want to rely on American platforms because data might go overseas, and that is totally inappropriate with them.”

Domestic Efforts

Consequently, several states are supporting national ventures. An example such effort is being developed in the Indian market, in which a firm is attempting to develop a sovereign LLM with state funding. This initiative has committed about $1.25bn to machine learning progress.

The expert envisions a system that is more compact than top-tier models from US and Chinese tech companies. He explains that the nation will have to make up for the funding gap with talent. Based in India, we do not possess the advantage of pouring billions of dollars into it,” he says. “How do we compete versus for example the enormous investments that the United States is devoting? I think that is where the key skills and the intellectual challenge plays a role.”

Local Priority

Throughout the city-state, a government initiative is funding AI systems trained in the region's native tongues. These particular tongues – for example the Malay language, Thai, Lao, Indonesian, Khmer and additional ones – are frequently inadequately covered in Western-developed LLMs.

I wish the individuals who are building these independent AI models were informed of just how far and just how fast the frontier is progressing.

A senior director participating in the program says that these systems are designed to supplement larger AI, rather than replacing them. Platforms such as ChatGPT and Gemini, he says, commonly find it challenging to handle native tongues and local customs – communicating in awkward Khmer, for instance, or recommending non-vegetarian dishes to Malay users.

Developing native-tongue LLMs allows state agencies to incorporate local context – and at least be “informed users” of a powerful tool created elsewhere.

He further explains, I am prudent with the concept sovereign. I think what we’re trying to say is we wish to be more accurately reflected and we aim to comprehend the capabilities” of AI platforms.

Multinational Partnership

For nations attempting to carve out a role in an intensifying global market, there’s a different approach: team up. Experts affiliated with a well-known university have suggested a state-owned AI venture allocated across a group of emerging states.

They term the project “Airbus for AI”, drawing inspiration from the European successful play to build a alternative to a major aerospace firm in the 1960s. Their proposal would see the establishment of a state-backed AI entity that would pool the resources of different states’ AI initiatives – including the UK, Spain, the Canadian government, Germany, the nation of Japan, Singapore, South Korea, the French Republic, the Swiss Confederation and the Kingdom of Sweden – to establish a viable alternative to the Western and Eastern major players.

The primary researcher of a study describing the concept states that the proposal has gained the attention of AI officials of at least a few countries up to now, in addition to several state AI companies. While it is now centered on “developing countries”, emerging economies – Mongolia and Rwanda for example – have additionally expressed interest.

He explains, In today’s climate, I think it’s an accepted truth there’s less trust in the assurances of this current US administration. Experts are questioning for example, should we trust these technologies? In case they decide to